Skip to content
AdminformaticsAdminformatics
Cancer Logix
Free · Public directory

The cancer research landscape, ranked.

A free, public directory that ranks and benchmarks 109 cancer research centers by NIH funding, clinical-trial activity, and publication output — refreshed weekly from public sources.

  • 109 NCI-designated & AACI centers
  • NIH RePORTER · ClinicalTrials.gov · PubMed
  • Refreshed weekly · no login
cancerlogx.com/directory
Center
1
Aldwych Comprehensive Cancer Center
BreastBloodLung
96$412M3189.4K
2
Northgate Cancer Institute
BloodGI
93$388M2918.7K
3
Veritas Oncology Center
LungGI
91$355M2648.1K
4
Harborview Cancer Research Center
BreastLung
88$331M2477.6K
5
Cedar Point Comprehensive Center
BreastBlood
85$298M2126.9K
6
Westmark Cancer Institute
GILung
82$276M1986.3K
7
Pinecrest Oncology Center
BloodBreast
79$251M1745.7K

Representative data. Explore the live directory for current figures.

The live directory — sortable and filterable · representative data

Coverage
0
Cancer centers
0K
Cancer grants
0K
Clinical trials
0K+
Publications

Every figure traces back to a public source, refreshed weekly.

01How the Excellence Score works

A ranking you can inspect.

Comparing centers usually means stitching three public sources together by hand — and each counts things differently. Cancer Logix measures every center the same way, and shows its math.

Comparing centers by hand
  • Comparing centers means stitching NIH RePORTER, ClinicalTrials.gov, and PubMed together by hand
  • Every source counts things differently, so nothing lines up
  • Rankings elsewhere rarely show their math
With Cancer Logix
  • Every center measured the same way, on normalized public data
  • One composite Excellence Score you can sort and filter instantly
  • Refreshed weekly, with the method stated plainly
  1. 01
    Inputs

    NIH funding (NIH RePORTER), clinical trials (ClinicalTrials.gov), and citation-weighted output (PubMed/iCite).

  2. 02
    Weighting / Normalization

    Inputs are normalized so centers of different sizes compare fairly.

  3. 03
    Composite score

    The normalized inputs combine into one Excellence Score per center.

  4. 04
    Rank

    Centers are ordered by score, updating automatically as new public data arrives.

FIG. 01 — How the Excellence Score is built, from public inputs to a comparable rank.

02What you can explore

Built to explore and compare.

01Ranked directory

Centers ordered by the Excellence Score — a composite of NIH funding, clinical trials, and publication output.

02Search & filter

Narrow the field by location, designation, and specialty.

03Side-by-side benchmarking

Compare any two centers on consistent, normalized data.

04Browse by cancer type

Explore 13 research domains and see which centers lead each.

05Research explorer

Open the NIH grants, active trials, and peer-reviewed publications behind every score.

06Always current

No login and no paywall — free to explore.

Answers, straight from public data
  • Which cancer centers lead in NIH funding this year?
  • How does one center compare to another on funding, trials, and publications?
  • How is this ranking actually calculated — what goes in, and how?
  • Where does our center sit relative to peers, on consistent data?
03See it in action

Walk through Cancer Logix yourself.

Not a mockup — click through the real product.

  1. 1Sort by any column — funding, trials, publications — and the ranking reshuffles instantly.
  2. 2Filter by cancer type to see who leads a specific domain.
  3. 3Every figure traces back to a public source: NIH RePORTER, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed/iCite.

Explore the cancer research landscape — ranked, filterable, and free.

Open the directory